Outils :Vous avez un site web ? Un blog ?
 Technorati reactions rencontre |
|
 |
 |
 |
| “ | Meatpuppet? Bouncehoper: What the crap is a meatpuppet? Baegis: A marionette that subsists on a diet solely of meat and its derivatives. Bouncehoper: ...How is that different than a sockpuppet? (also, makes me hungry....) Baegis: Sockpuppets, of course, eat cotton products, which are severely lacking in nutrition and deliciousness. Bouncehoper: How....strange....lol. thanks! |
” |
Perhaps you can participate in it here? It seems that you clearly have a history of "rivalry" with Badagnani. Eugene2x►talk 23:46, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
I'd be happy to know in what way you feel I'm not being objective. -GTBacchus(talk) 00:19, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
MuZemike 02:46, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for correcting my rating for bacon in popular culture. I may have been slightly over-enthusiastic. It's fortunate that I can rely on the good judgement of my fellow editors to keep things in check if I mess up. Take care and have fun! ChildofMidnight (talk) 06:49, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
You are still following my edits[2][3], then you think you deserve to falsely accuse me of hounding you? Don't play a victim card. I want you to stop chasing my contribution to Korean cuisine. There are "many" native speakers of English who can fix my English per my request, so I don't need your special care as long as you demonize me and make bogus accusation. I've tried to assume good faith on you regardless of your various wrongdoing to me, but you are the one re-igniting the old animosity with your disruptive behaviors. When you attacked me with the racist attack on the admin's page and accused me of being stalking you for my good faith advice on OTRS images, you clarified your position against me. To be clear, the alleged stalking of mine was done right after you stalked to my newly created articles? So your hounding of me is okay to continue? To sum up, do not follow my edits any more. I'm done with you.--Caspian blue 00:48, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi. I noticed your recent post at Badagnani's page, which he removed. You may have noticed that I'm working with Badagnani. I'm not sure what you're trying to achieve with a post like that... do you really think that telling someone to leave you alone on the internet will make them leave you alone? As part of this dispute resolution, do you think you could moderate your tone, or if that's not possible then please ask me when you're having a problem before you go to Badagnani's page with another angry post that doesn't accomplish anything, except perhaps that you feel satisfied making it.
Unfortunately, your satisfaction is not prioritized ahead of encyclopedia writing, and combativeness — regardless of who started it — never helps with encyclopedia writing. Combativeness is a really bad idea, and it hurts the project. If you respond to combativeness with more combativeness, then you've just doubled the problem. Rather than doing that learn to de-escalate. If you cannot or will not do that, then I strongly urge you to get my attention when you're experiencing trouble with Badagnani, and then let me handle the situation. Your reactions to him are part of the problem right now. Think hard about that. Thanks for understanding. -GTBacchus(talk) 01:26, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
In terms of this, I think the image can be removed altogether... there's not much value in a picture of a kid holding his head. Cheers, Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :D 03:59, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi, it's BlueCaper. I do not see why your opposition includes the "problems" of Harry J. Lincoln. Just because I created it does not mean the sole responsibility of the article should be on me. The page does not belong to me; it belongs to Wikipedia. It is everyone's job (not just mine) to make an article efficient.
But I am not here to rant and rave. Let me show you some gratitude for helping me and thousands of others make Wikipedia a better place.
Thank you.
-BlueCaper (talk) 13:03, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi I see you also had some trouble regarding User:Ironholds. I lost my temper with him earlier as I'm sick and tired of people criticising the articles I create. I really hate the overlook of some people on here it has to be said, I'm sure you feel exactly the same way in such discussions when you are branded all sorts of clearly untrue things. Sometimes we think "Why do we bother?" huh? And for the record your English is excellent, igore the tripe. Dr. Blofeld White cat 17:43, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
| My RFA passed today at 61/5/4. Thanks for participating in my RFA. I appreciate all the comments I received and will endeavor to justify the trust the WP community has placed in me. Have a nice day. :-) AdjustShift (talk) 21:31, 11 April 2009 (UTC) |
 |
Hey there Caspian,
I know you and I have some philosophical differences on what makes a good nom... my philosophy is basically contained in this essay: How to nominate somebody for RfA. As your opinion at RfA has (surprisingly based upon our first interactions) become one that I am growning to respect... basically, my belief it that you highlight the weakness(es) of your candidate for three reasons:
I have the same belief about politicians. A politician who admits his/her failings will, IMO, do better than the same politician if some reporter breaks the story. I also reveal the flaws because I once glossed over them... and I vowed never to nom somebody without being upfront with any weaknesses that I knew about. I did that once, and never again. If their track record is such that I can't look past their biggest flaw, then I won't nom them. If there is a reason that I think a flaw can be over looked (a single incident of bad judgment from half a year ago is such) I will do so and explain why I don't think it is an issue with the candidate in particular.---I'm Spartacus! NO! I'm Spartacus! 03:02, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Spinnspark reminded me of the fifth reason why I'm open about character flaws... people at RfA like to latch around an item that is negative about a candidate. When there is a surprise, people instantly start wondering, "What other surprises are we missing." By recognizing the flaws, people aren't wondering what they are missing. They get to say, "Hey I supported a person with these flaws before."---I'm Spartacus! NO! I'm Spartacus! 21:04, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
I apologise, I didn't see your notice until today. I'm looking into the issue now. J Milburn (talk) 16:57, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
Please explain why you have removed the image that I added to Carina Axelsson, as the image as used meets the Fair use criteria. Unionsoap (talk) 01:09, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
I have read a number of articles about Korea and found that you've made quite a few contributions, and I am assuming that you are both Korean and possibly live in Korea.
I have made some discoveries about Korean cars that are only available in Korea, such as the Hyundai Equus, the Dynasty, the Grandeur, and the Centennial. I was wondering if you have a digital camera and might have an opportunity to take a few photos? Now that Hyundai has become a major player in the automotive world, I thought it would be nice to see older Hyundai's and other Korean cars that the rest of the world isn't aware of.
If you can't help with this request, do you know of anyone who might be able to help?
Thank you for your time, (Regushee (talk) 16:17, 10 April 2009 (UTC))
 |
On March 26, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Galbitang, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
--Dravecky (talk) 18:34, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi Caspian blue, I saw what you posted on WP:WPCATS. I suggest that you bring this to Wikipedia:RM#Requesting_potentially_controversial_moves.--Lenticel (talk) 07:27, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi Caspian,
I have been working on correcting the references in the Korean cuisine article and would like your help in completing them. I have separated the sources that are in Korean and would like you help in translating such things as article titles, authors and other information. This would be a great help as all I have is Google language tools, which is a non-contextual translator that leaves a lot to be desired.
Thanks, Jeremy (blah blah) 18:31, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
Sorry, I posted a question for you at Anonymous Dissident's RfB, but I forgot to let you know, which is not very polite. Sorry for that. Anyway, you'll find the question below your !vote. Hope you don't mind the question. If you do mind it, drop a response here or on my talk page - let's not clog up AD's RfB page. --Dweller (talk) 15:34, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi Caspian blue. Thank you for your principled action. In my mind you stand for the best that Wikipedia has to offer. Tasos (Dr.K. logos 00:41, 31 March 2009 (UTC))
I believed you once had a dispute with Tenmei, resulting in you filing this dispute: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive471#User:Tenmei.27s_abusing_AfD_and_personal_attacks, Would you care to give more details at ArbCom?Teeninvestor (talk) 21:41, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Just to tell you, I'm not on the side of the troll; in fact, I condemn him. By the way, I remember that sources do not have to display notability; they only need to display verifiablity.Teeninvestor (talk) 23:37, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
No, ArbCom won't save time, considering there was no problem to begin with; just Tenmei's obstinacy. ArbCom cases are lengthy and I'm not very happy being involved in all of that.Teeninvestor (talk) 22:17, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
Note that the problem with the article is solved, and there wasn't any edit warring for a while????? And what do you mean that "this is not limited to this case?"Teeninvestor (talk) 22:23, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
How would emailing you help???? Also, note how links have been provided to the source, as well as standard bibliographical information, which would make it verifiable, eh? That isn't exactly "controversial", or else the editors of said articles would have said so.Teeninvestor (talk) 22:26, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
The "edit war" with "Mongolian editors" was very strange. I was adding sections to the article, and they deleted it without explanation. Then they left. It was one of the strangest disputes I went through. i wouldn't say it was a nationalist dispute; they didn't even say why/what they were deleting it? Then Tenmei came in with his "rhetorical skills", and you know what that leads to. Oh ya, what's your email? I'm not too good with the emailUser feature. Teeninvestor (talk) 23:22, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your advice, Caspian Blue! I was not aware of this feud. I just saw this article as an ARS member and wanted to improve it.Teeninvestor (talk) 21:19, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
Sorry I've decided not to use the emailUser feature. I was spammed.Teeninvestor (talk) 14:44, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Tang Dynasty/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Tang Dynasty/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Mailer Diablo 14:04, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
--Caspian blue 06:13, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
User:Tenmei has filed an ArbCom case against me and I have done a little research on Tenmei and noted you have interacted with this user. Can you help provide an opinion about him? Thanks.Teeninvestor (talk) 22:06, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
Link:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Tang_Dynasty/Evidence
Since you've expressed an interest, it would most advisable for you to participate in the discussion. I feel your participation will go a long way to resolving the class. Teeninvestor (talk) 22:09, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
After second thought, I reopened my email. A second view of the spam emails I received saw that they were a scam, pretending to be from the "wikimedia foundation". That cleared up things a lot, as I previously thought they were from wikipedia, so I disabled my EmailUser.Teeninvestor (talk) 22:29, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Oh really. Thank you.Teeninvestor (talk) 12:18, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed that you posted some information about a problem editor at [[11]].
Given the long-term problems that have been going on with the user in question, I believe that it is time that a WP:Long term abuse thread be started on this user, regardless of what his or her primary account might be (more than 100 socks have been recorded as of writing).
As you seem to know a lot about what this editor has been up to, I think you might be in a position to alert the Wikipedia community at large in relation to the said user.
I had originally intended to post evidence in the said ArbCom case that would demonstrate that many of the problems at the Inner Asia during the Tang Dynasty article have been repeated elsewhere due to the persistent addition of highly inappropriate material to a large number of pages that are not as frequently patrolled as "popular" articles are by the vandal and a failure to recognize long-term abuse. However, given the complex nature of the abuses and the danger of "feeding the troll", I have refrained from doing so.
I would like to draw your attention to the fact that the "toxic" IPs (as another user described them) in question appeared to have posted veiled racist comments at a number of user talk pages. A notable example can be found here: [12]. In this case, I believe he was trying to denigrate a large number of other editors by engaging in pointless debate.
I am a little puzzled though as to why he or she made rude comments at User talk:Arilang1234, considering that the comments seem to go against the very ideas that the troll had been trying to push.
I had reported this user earlier to User:Ryulong on account of the fact that edits by IP accounts involving Nazi themes had been made this year, suggesting that the little known but highly disruptive User:RestoreTheEmpireSociety is still active; unfortunately no action was taken.
As suggested in various checkuser requests, this editor also appears to impersonate some other persona frequently in order to make fun of editors from certain ethnic backgrounds (particularly Arabs); I also suspect he or she edited Talk:Tang Dynasty under a username in order to mock Korean editors. I think you should check the user account out to see if the person behind it actually a serious editor or just an impersonator.
There is one thing that I am almost certain about: the editor involved is not the aptly named User:Nationalist (who also caused chaos across a large number of articles).
By the way, I wonder why the ArbCom case is titled "Tang Dynasty" even though it is really about "Inner Asia during..."? Alpha77a (talk) 12:12, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
I think I might have to take up your offer in the near future. I do love East Asian ceramic wares, especially celadon. Plus, you are right, there is a lack of good quality Korean articles. I'll see what I can do, but I won't feel comfortable creating a new article unless I have gathered at least four good scholarly sources that I can cite. Cheers.--Pericles of AthensTalk 13:56, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Blocks, although often needed, have an unfortunate and horrible effect on anyone who is on the receiving end; the experience is not at all pleasant, and administrators and even arbitrators fail to truly comprehend the precise effect. I would not wish to compound the effect on anyone. I think we will still have disagreements even in the future, but hopefully, they can be resolved more amicably - if we can achieve that much, then that's certainly worth it. Thank you for the note, and apology accepted. :) Ncmvocalist (talk) 15:58, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
Thankyou! J Milburn (talk) 21:58, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Why thank you, Caspian Blue for the medal, and for a glimpse of your cat picture, above. Its a great choice and pic. Victuallers (talk) 19:53, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
...for the barnstar! :D PC78 (talk) 12:10, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Many thanks! JPBarrass (talk) 15:27, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
- Cheers. Having gone around the fortress making notes and trying to get the page right, I now feel like I built it!JPBarrass (talk) 15:37, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for advise at 3RR noticeboard. Unfortunately, I can not follow your advice because of insufficient time. It was only once that I started a case, and only because I was asked by User:Durova. Not any more. Thanks.Biophys (talk) 20:38, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Re this: sorry if what I was reverting was actually accurate. I'm not familiar with this period in history, I just noticed what appeared to be a major change that could have been motivated by nationalist POV-pushing and figured it should be reverted unless there was discussion. If you think the new wording is better, though, that's ok with me, since you know a lot more about it than I do. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 15:35, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
Hello. Sorry, but I haven't been able to concentrate on this topic lately (as you requested). I'm still busy with the Han Dynasty FAC and my real life work is piling up on my desk. This may take a while.--Pericles of AthensTalk 17:03, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
You are involved in a recently-filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration#Macedonia naming dispute and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—
Thanks,--Yannismarou (talk) 22:36, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
Law shoot! 12:18, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks very much for the barnstar! I sincerely appreciate the sentiment. :-) —David Levy 20:12, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your comment on my nomination - I've responded here [14]. Cheers, Paxse (talk) 05:31, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
An Arbitration case involving you has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Macedonia 2/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Macedonia 2/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, —— nixeagleemail me 03:30, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi, Caspian-- 오래간 만이에요. (I realize I was a bit of a horse's ass in our last encounter, but I hope you can understand my feelings on the situation too...) Thanks for translating the KMDb biography of Kang Dae-ha. I was working through it myself, but wasn't confident enough to post my translation yet. The only difference I had with your translation was with "찬가 / 讚歌". I thought that this was a type of poem-- like a hyangga... Anyway, thanks again for helping out with the article. Regards. Dekkappai (talk) 13:33, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
I thought you were talking about me. I guess I'm vain like that. V?... I do think those editors need to leave the other editor alone. It's one thing to have a difference of opinion, but to follow an editor around and to keep going after them is pretty bad form. There are enough articles that need work without that kind of drama. Anyway, I hope you're having fun. I took a picture of a jellyfish dish this past weekend. Probably it isn't needed, but it's the thought that counts! ChildofMidnight (talk) 21:20, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
Trust me. None of us know what he is saying(neither do the Admins). But your testimony will still be valuable. just provide it as i'm sure the Admins will know what you are saying, and it may help clear up the case.Teeninvestor (talk) 00:12, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
R you still thinking about making your evidence on the page??? time is running out.Teeninvestor (talk) 20:39, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
The rest of the editors are being contacted by me to make statements. Just make yours. And no, Tenmei didn't bother me as much as he did to you.Teeninvestor (talk) 20:49, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
If he does harass you that will just be good diffs to bring up on ArbCom.Teeninvestor (talk) 20:58, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi. From your last post at ANI, I'm not sure we understand each other. Do you know what I advocate, as s solution to these issues? -GTBacchus(talk) 18:10, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
Borrowed from somewhere.
Thank you for the barnstar. I sincerely hope that I can continue to act in such a way that people don't question granting me such recognition. And my apologies for the delay in response. A relative recently died and there has been some unexpected paperwork to deal with which was proving to be more than a bit distracting. Luckily, they tell me that the documentation problems are resolved now, so I hope to be a bit less distracted. John Carter (talk) 16:14, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
Sorry? –Juliancolton | Talk 19:02, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
Caspian, when I was briefly in Seoul there were birds used to pick fortunes, a lot of veggie soups in stoneware or earthenware bowls, and some kind of sea slug that didn't look tasty to me. Do these things have a particular name or names? Thanks. ChildofMidnight (talk) 20:25, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
Hey Casp. Thank you for your support. Please don't get caught up in any of the nastiness. There are many more opposes to come. I'm a big boy and I can handle it. The examples are interesting to me because as with the sources for Michael Jackson being a "businessman" and the Tina Turner opening paragraph, I still think the other editors are mistaken. But we learn from our mistakes and I could have been more tactful in dealing with the WP:OWN and other issues. ;) Anyway, please don't worry or feel that you have to defend me. My bad jokes are getting me in a lot of trouble, but my sense of humor is a strong defense. I've made mistakes, so many of the concerns are legitimate. Cheers. ChildofMidnight (talk) 06:27, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
Dear Caspian blue,
I am a student in Seoul National University in Korea doing a research project on Wikipedia. I am very impressed about your insight. Reading your page, I see you are truly concerned about a variety of issues, and I appreciate your contributions. So I thought you could provide some opinions really worthwhile. So, would it be possible for you to take some time off and give an online interview via E-mail or online messenger? It would provide my project a lively voice of an actual editor, and this will be of a great meaning; your experience, concerns, opinions and ideas would add a lot to my project. Actually I'm in real need of something concrete; for my project is about the mechanism a biased version of explanation is settled, and as you will probably guess, understanding such things involves a lot more than just watching explicit process. Again, I would really, really appreciate your help.
It will not take that long; in fact everything will depend completely upon your will. If you are willing to give some help, would you mind mailing me within April? Thanks a lot.
Sincerely, Bongeun bongeun319@hanmail.net
121.170.42.47 (talk) 01:33, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
As long as someone is not logging out and adding evidence as an IP instead of using their account it is fine. Please do revert. Thanks. KnightLago (talk) 01:40, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
I didn't realise that I was on this guy's list of people who 'did not try to help'. Yikes. Nick-D (talk) 01:57, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
Since I made this article, can you just delete it and can I make it all over again? I'm sorry for deleting the thingy on the top, I didn't realize I could delete it. TaeyeonSaranghae (talk) 12:44, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
No problem (and thank you for participating at AfD). Good luck with your DYK! :) Cheers, –Juliancolton | Talk 16:02, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
Hey Casp. Thanks very much for your friendship and generous support of my candidacy. It meant a lot to me as I have great respect for your judgement and integrity. ChildofMidnight (talk) 20:45, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
Tenmei has contacted GeorgewilliamHebert to make a statement or take some kind of action against you. Although he has now removed the post, just be careful- he might contact someone else or do something else to make you feel uncomfortable.Teeninvestor (talk) 22:49, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
. Teeninvestor (talk) 19:30, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
Nevermind, it seems it was a "noble gambit" from Tenmei's part. I seriously think ArBCom should place sanctions against this guy; at least a topic ban on asia should be in order. By the way, when are the arbitrators going to look at this? I can just imagine when the look on their faces when they first see our diffs on Tenmei, and then his TLDR comments.Teeninvestor (talk) 00:17, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
I hope ArbCom gets this case done fast, and the solutions in quickly. Teeninvestor (talk) 20:25, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Because this is the English Wikipedia, editors should use English-language sources in preference to sources in other languages, assuming the availability of an English-language source of equal quality, so that readers can easily verify that the source has been used correctly. Where editors translate a direct quote, they should quote the relevant portion of the original text in a footnote or in the article. Translations published by reliable sources are preferred over translations made by Wikipedia editors.
(bolding mine).
I think this bit of info just proved Tenmei shot himself in the foot. Also, it seems they do not want to be involved in the case(though an uninvolved editor has expressed interest). It seems Tenmei included them for no reason.Teeninvestor (talk) 20:43, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi Caspian blue. I noticed that you started an ANI sub-section about me. That's fine, but I can assure that my comment about editing by Russavia was made in a good faith. If you have any concerns or questions, I would be happy to answer. Thank you for your comments.Biophys (talk) 23:35, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
I've made a start, but have a few questions. The "Biography" section suggests that his first screenplay was Somebody's' House (Tain-ui jip) in 1970, but the "Filmography" says Snowstorm (Nunbora) in 1968. Also, Somebody's' House and A Girl's First Love aren't listed in the filmography. PC78 (talk) 00:12, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
--Caspian blue 03:28, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
From WP:ANI: "I warned him at Talk:Nokdumuk last Sunday not to edit with editors". Please clarify whether this is meant to say "... to edit war with editors" as I do not want to presume anything about your meaning. Regards, SHEFFIELDSTEELTALK 17:36, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for the message, Arilang1234, but I save it as a diff. --Caspian blue 04:52, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
R u sure about this? And how would you do it anyway?(Scan the menu???).Teeninvestor (talk) 19:11, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
I think you should reduce your evidence size a bit(it is just over 1000 words). I've reduced my evidence size so that not counting quotes from wikipedia policy pages(of which I have two) I am below 1000 words(999). I had to trim my evidence by close to 700 words to get it in size. See this diff diffTeeninvestor (talk) 01:03, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
|
On May 1, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kang Dae-ha, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
BorgQueen (talk) 19:20, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Notable? ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:09, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
[18] Here he accused you of sockpuppetry and saying you should be banned. He also seemed to have symphatheies with the guy at Liancourt rocks who was banned.Teeninvestor (talk) 13:41, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
|
On 2 May, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Anyangcheon, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Royalbroil 13:46, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
I have no problem with moving the section to workshop. My belief is that first we should try to establish principles and then talk about sanctions.Teeninvestor (talk) 23:21, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
You may want to comment at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Attack page. --Tenmei (talk) 00:44, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
Can you believe it was a year ago we were discussing Garak Market? It is incredible how quick the last year passed. Dr. Blofeld White cat 12:56, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
Thankyou!! Yum yum! Dr. Blofeld White cat 22:09, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
I'll have a word with the Arbs to see if they want the Extended Content to stay or be shifted elsewhere. There are far worse ones (one recent case clocked 750k+++), but we will keep an eye on the case to keep it at a manageable level. - Best regards, Mailer Diablo 20:47, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Never ask a question you don't know the answer to; I feel that the latest question should be rephrased a bit, as in "why did you go to arbCom even when everyone else was against it".Teeninvestor (talk) 01:41, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
Bringing the Mongol editors into the case would only cause this case to be expanded, most likely to Tenmei's delight as he gets more ammo to use against me and you.Teeninvestor (talk) 21:30, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
HOly crap! I didn't think she should have been blocked just for that. That was a huge misuse of admin power. Whoever committed it should be desysoped immediately.Teeninvestor (talk) 01:17, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
Just gets better and better. He removed large amounts of info and sources from the article just because he didn't agree with it. It is vandalism, I tell you. diff diff diff diff. You know what's funny? He provided me with these links. This guy's a gem.
By the way, he also attacked editor User:Patar Knight who was uninvolved but predictably went against him. Teeninvestor (talk) 21:07, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
You may want to comment on the proposals I have at Workshop.Teeninvestor (talk) 20:07, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
Please check new articles created by me :Dangguo and Black jails Arilang talk 09:05, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
I posted what I think should be Tenmei's punishment. Please have a look at workshop.Teeninvestor (talk) 23:43, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
Thanks Caspian blue for adding templates to Black jails talk page, may be you can do the same to List of political offences that attract jail terms in China. Arilang talk 07:31, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
In this case, it's the date at which we expect to have a decision ready for voting. There are more details at WP:AC/A, if you're curious. Kirill [talk] [pf] 20:03, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
I'm having some nice boiled and sliced squid with a tangy sweet red sauce (a few sesame seeds in it too) in your honor. It's very cheap, only a couple bucks for a big dish of it. Then I'm going to have the boiled maize I got. Cheers! ChildofMidnight (talk) 18:01, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
_from_Korean_grocer.jpg)
Well first, thanks for the vote of confidence. But I always figured I was too short-tempered to make a good admin. Also I've got quite recent incidents which may be taken as a sign of violating WP:BITE (mainly this conversation). Might think about it in the future. Cheers, cab (talk) 02:31, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
|
On May 11, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Buddha Jumps Over the Wall, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Shubinator (talk) 17:23, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
| My RFA passed today at 75/2/1 so I wanted to thank you for your participation in it. Special thanks go to GlassCobra and FlyingToaster for their nomination and support. Cheers! --Rosiestep (talk) 02:17, 12 May 2009 (UTC) |
 |
| Thank you for supporting me in my recent RfA, which unfortunately did not pass with a final tally of (45/39/9). I plan on addressing the concerns raised and working to improve in the next several months. Special thanks go to MBisanz, GT5162, and MC10 for nominating me. Thanks again, -download ׀ sign! 03:37, 12 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
Just created Template:JapanEmpireNavbox to aid in the navigation of Empire of Japan related articles. Please check for inconsistencies and add contributions of your own. Thanks. -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email guestbook complaints 08:58, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Hello, at Talk:Buddha Jumps Over the Wall#Straw poll I have attempted to summarize in a few words views you expressed at Talk:Buddha Jumps Over the Wall#Due weight to shark finning. Please refactor or confirm if my summary is consistent with your views. Thank you, Bongomatic 23:33, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Did you see Tenmei? He was posting a denial to every one of my remedies and facts. Lols.Teeninvestor (talk) 22:57, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Chzz ► 17:30, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
I present to you Economic history of China which is finished!!! Okay, if you want to help , here's the to-do list: 1. add more citations 2. Expand Ming, Qing, ROC, PRC sections(Which were a bit rushed) 3. Get pictures. Teeninvestor (talk) 13:42, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
By the way, Tenmei is deleting all my comments on his talk page. lols.Teeninvestor (talk) 14:04, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
I love how you can recognize every Ziggymaster sock by his edit summaries saying "there is no consensus!" or "there is strong opposition!" even though every editor but him has agreed that the version he's reverting to is wrong. I guess you could consider it 'strong opposition' if you count all of his socks... rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 15:52, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
I'm just letting you know that I removed over 300 wikilinks on Kim Jin-kyu because most of the blue links were linking to irrelevant pages and I imagine the red ones are unlikely to go blue anytime soon. I would recommend not restoring them until new articles are created because even some of the statistically improbable titles like The Heart is a Lonely Hunter have other meanings. The links that go to the correct films are still intact. --- Best wishes, Soap Talk/Contributions 22:25, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the useful input! I was not sure if I was using too many citation tags. The article is really progressing in comprehensibility and verifiability nonetheless.Apothecia (talk) 20:52, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the rewriting Hanbok. I think you've done a superb job of it. :) 23:19, 18 May 2009 (UTC)—Preceding unsigned comment added by Cydevil38 (talk • contribs)
나비 (na-bi) is the character’s name in There she is!! (Korean: 떳다 그녀!!). 나비 in Korean means butterfly in English, use any dictionary. The Linux software Nabi uses a butterfly on their logo. Cat in Korean is 고양이 (go-yang-i). 납이 (nab-i) or 납 (nab) is the Korean word for lead (plumbum). What evidence do you have that 나비 is used for Cat? --Bejnar (talk) 21:02, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
For some weird reason I can't not directly response to Bejnar's protest. So I make a new section in response to him/her.
Those have nothing to do with horse. I'm not sure what you're talking about.--Caspian blue 21:38, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
Nice find on the photo. Are there any problems using historical images from online sources if I set proper non-free image use? Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 20:01, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Newyorkbrad is starting to work on the proposals. A decision should be reached soon.Teeninvestor (talk) 21:43, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
diff. Yikes, a Poetlister-style sockpuppeteer on ArbCom.Teeninvestor (talk) 14:48, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
Heads up, an arbitrator seems to be relatively favorable towards Tenmei.Teeninvestor (talk) 11:39, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
It appears that nobody has yet begun today's section. Did he die today or yesterday? I'm sure there is no harm in nominating him under the 22nd (which it probably still is in the US). The future events section is probably more for things like elections and spaceflights but (having originally created it and not been informed of why items should be removed) I am puzzled as to why something would be removed from it for no reason. It was probably removed from P:CE because it is a death and they expect you to put those at Deaths in 2009 (those IPs don't seem to leave edit summaries, I too find this annoying and confusing at times). However, if it is to be a death debate it should be OK to nominate it at WP:ITN/C under the 22nd. --candle•wicke 02:59, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 |
On 23 May 2009, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Roh Moo-hyun, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page. |
It has been posted now. Thanks for you contributions and asking for assistance. :) --candle•wicke 17:34, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your note. I am certainly not the 'manager' of the baklava article, but I have it on my watchlist because it attracts an inordinate amount of attention from POV-pushers (not that your comment is in that category!). I agree that there are all sorts of silly disputes on this and other talk pages, but at least they are relevant to editing the article. Musing about how fattening a food is... well, I just don't see the point on a Talk page. --macrakis (talk) 19:50, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
That's fine. I'm still looking through the evidence. Wizardman 22:57, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
NYB has finished posting at proposed decision. You may want to comment.Teeninvestor (talk) 20:21, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
...for posting the edit stats at Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Majorly 2. Gives me a nice break. :) –Juliancolton | Talk 23:29, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Please don't add dictionary definitions to disambig pages, see WP:DAB. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 23:15, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
I'll re-look at the evidence for that over the next day - I don't think I looked at it as closely as I should have, if what you've found is true or an uderstatement. Wizardman 03:37, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
I would like to thank you for coming out and participating in my Request for Adminship, which closed unsuccessfully at (48/8/6) based on my withdrawal. I withdrew because in my opinion I need to focus on problems with my content contributions before I can proceed with expanding my responsibilities. Overall I feel that the RfA has improved me as an editor and in turn some articles which in my eyes is successful. Thank you again for your participation. Cheers and happy editing.--kelapstick (talk) 19:00, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
I was skimming DYK and came across your work on the Voight article. I noted that it is close to the needed expansion to go through (which would be great). I was thinking an obvious area to expand is actually the lead. It is currently one para, and doesn't mention the weight/ loss controversy at all. I think the lead would be better as around three paras rather than the current one. Normally i would jump in and just do it myself, but I know nothing of the topic and you seem to be busy doing a great job, so I just thought I'd make the suggestion here. I hope you don't feel I'm just making work for another editor (ie. you!) :-) If you want to ping me at my talk page and ask me to do it, that's fine, but i may not get to it for about 48 hrs. cheers. hamiltonstone (talk) 00:10, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
|
On June 2, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Gopchang jeongol, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Dravecky (talk) 02:21, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi CB,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Quaterionenadler David de Negker.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on June 5, 2009. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2009-06-05. howcheng {chat} 05:19, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 |
The Barnstar of Good Humor | |
| For working on Deborah Voigt for WP:DYK while enduring terrible puns about weight loss. Bearian (talk) 18:41, 2 June 2009 (UTC) |
Okay, but you'll will need to disengage from the conflict as well, otherwise it won't help matters. I'll inform him accordingly. - Mailer Diablo 22:16, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
|
On June 3, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Deborah Voigt, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Royalbroil 15:49, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
I believe Supersentai is using a sockpuppet, Triassic ranger, to avoid his previous warnings and discussions. Please feel free to comment on how you think of this case. 01:43, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Melonbarblaster has begun a discussion about the inclusion of dog meat in the article, please feel free to discuss on the talk page. --Jeremy (blah blah) 02:06, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
I've been informed by one of the arbitrators that you will be included as a party to the Tang Dynasty case. - Mailer Diablo 10:39, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
|
On June 7, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Gotjawal Forest, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Backslash Forwardslash 21:56, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
You're welcome. I've done more on Jeju-do than Gotjawal Forest. My edits on Gotjawal Forest are mainly related to WP:MOS issues, but I'm happy to help where I can. Thank you for your kind notice. 152.16.16.75 (talk) 00:29, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 |
The 50 DYK Medal | |
| Well done Caspian! Congrats for all your hard work, particularly on Korea and Korean cuisine! May you soon reach 100 DYKs! Dr. Blofeld White cat 18:06, 9 June 2009 (UTC) |
I just spotted your statement that Tenmei has created a sandbox attacking me on the Dutch wiki at Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Tang Dynasty/Proposed decision. Could you please provide a link to this? thanks, Nick-D (talk) 10:30, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 |
I'd like to thank everyone who took part in my RfA, which closed 79/3/6, so I'm now another proud bearer of the mop-and-bucket - hopefully I'll wield them with success! I'd also like to say that I found the process to be welcoming, friendly and supportive, with the support comments encouraging and the oppose and neutral comments offering good feedback, so I had a very positive experience, despite the fact that, from all the comments and discussions, I was expecting something much more negative - thanks for helping to make it a worthwile experience! Many thanks once again, Colds7ream (talk) 13:01, 10 June 2009 (UTC) |
Hey Caspian, I could use another opinion at Talk:South Korea#Image changes. Thanks, rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 21:13, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above.
This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above.
Tenmei (talk · contribs) is topic-banned from Inner Asia during the Tang Dynasty for a period of six months. He is permitted to comment on the talkpage, provided that he does so in a civil fashion. He is instructed not to interact with or comment with regard to Teeninvestor (talk · contribs) or Caspian blue (talk · contribs) on any page of Wikipedia (except in the course of legitimate dispute resolution initiated by others or his mentors). Tenmei shall also be assigned one or more volunteer mentors. Other remedies also apply.
The parties are instructed to carefully review the principles and findings contained in this decision. Each of the parties is strongly urged to conform his or her future behavior to the principles set forth in this decision. Should the remedies fail to improve the situation described in this decision, after a reasonable time, an application may be made to reopen the case and impose other remedies as may be necessary.
- For the Committee, Mailer Diablo 22:46, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your insights and suggestions! I want to 'catch you up' the concerns raised. My DYK comment and response:
"Thank you both for your insights and consideration! I've reworked the hook slightly and ask your opinion. Caspian, the issues you mention have been rectified in the "Master Cat" article (thank you for solving the snarl with the title!) and I do agree with you that the two articles need some consideration. There is not much to merge into "The Master Cat, or Puss in Boots" from "Puss in Boots (fairy tale)" as much of the latter article is unsourced and has an OR tang, especially in the analysis section. I suggest a "Variants" or a "Cat as Helper" section in "The Master Cat" article examining the topic from well respected folklorists and retaining only the "adaptations" that are supremely notable such as Tchaikovsky's ballet and the Faerie Tale production. Perrault's Puss in Boots has inspired legion upon legion of "adaptations" over the centuries and it is impractical in my opinion to list every single one of them no matter how insignificant they are in the greater scheme of things in "The Master Cat" article without giving the topic "adaptations" undue weight. Alternatively, ALL adaptations could be listed in a stand alone article called "Puss in Boots adaptations". What do you think of my proposal? Caspain, I'm so sorry you preceive me as using "accusatory tone" with Matisse. Nothing of the sort was intended. I was simply stating a 'right to the point' fact. Kathyrncelestewright (talk) 22:15, 14 June 2009 (UTC)"
Hope to hear from you! Kathyrncelestewright (talk) 22:25, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
HI! Any chance you can develop this into a DYK? Dr. Blofeld White cat 15:54, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi. I saw that you are looking for articles to use as a model for bios about opera singers. You might want to check out bios from WP:G&S: Valerie Masterson, Richard Suart, Kenneth Sandford, Gillian Knight, Ellen Beach Yaw, Rutland Barrington and Jessie Bond. Best regards, -- Ssilvers (talk) 19:58, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the message. Best of luck with your project. Let me know if you have any questions that I might be able to answer. Best wishes, -- Ssilvers (talk) 01:18, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Re [20]. You missed Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Climate_change_dispute William M. Connolley (talk) 17:27, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 |
Olive Branch of Peace | |
| I come here offering an olive branch in the hopes of coming to some sort of peace with you. I know we have had major disagreements in the past, and I would like to work together with you to sort those out so we can work cooperatively on whatever articles we may work on together in the future. For any rudeness or misinterpretation of your postings on my part in the past, I sincerely apologize. Perhaps that may not be enough, but I do honestly want to work well with you here on Wikipedia, so I'd like to form a peace with you. I think we do have the same goals in mind for Wikipedia: to make it an excellent, free, detailed, and neutral encyclopedia. I admire a lot of the work you have done to improve things (and you really have done a lot), and I hope we can work together in a spirit of mutual respect in the future. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 20:50, 25 June 2009 (UTC) |
Actually, it really does meet the standards of GA. I believe it would need more if it were to be a FAC. --Jeremy (blah blah) 20:52, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Since you have in the past taken part in related discussions, this comes as a notification that the Centralized discussion page set up to decide on a comprehensive naming convention about Macedonia-related naming practices is now inviting comments on a number of competing proposals from the community. Please register your opinions on the RfC subpages 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.
Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:00, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
CaspianBlue, you might like to know that ChrisO has contacted many of the editors who signed Wikipedia:Centralized_discussion/Macedonia/main_articles#Users_who_endorse_Proposal_B asking them to change or justify their position. Regards, SHEFFIELDSTEELTALK 18:56, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
My page, you know the drill :) - NeutralHomer • Talk • 23:36, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
back from 22:05, 26 June 2009 for 24 hours, ip and my accounts only edited twice.
oh,sorry. i checked three edits on 24. just now,i left message on the talk page and waiting for others' response. one of my account is redirected to another, and add 'Doppelganger' to tell, i will never deny it is one account,lot. thanks again .Georgezhao (talk) 00:13, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi, Caspian blue. Could you come to Talk:Joseon Dynasty and join discussions on Joseon Dynasty's sovereignty? A User:Jpatokal are I do not agree on the issue and I think 3rd opinion from editors would be good in the current circumstance. I need more opinion from editors who know Korean history. Thank you.--Historiographer (talk) 07:58, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
Hey Casp, how is your article work coming? I'll be interested to check out your latest projects. I very much appreciate your concern and interest in helping to resolve some recent conflicts, but I hope you'll get back to the fun stuff. Not everything is fixable, but at least there's plenty of good stuff to read, eat and look at. ChildofMidnight (talk) 18:02, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
Are you hunting snark? There's a lot of it around here. ChildofMidnight (talk) 04:24, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
I'm really sorry. I was going to revert another article and made a mistake to click your talk page. It was simply a mere mistake. Then I tried to reverted myself but you beat me. Please accept my apology. Regards.Oda Mari (talk) 02:01, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
to get rested from some muddy swamp, so if anyone want to ask me about something for something of something which I might be interested in or know, please visit other users that I maybe work together...Thanks.--Caspian blue 02:15, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi, Inugami-bargho. Thank you for creating the useful and interesting article to Wikipedia. However, I'm not sure why you're so agitated by my simple tagging.[23] I think the sentence The population of wild living domestic dogs in Australia is now probably higher than ever before. is vague because the intro does not reveal when the research was conducted, and "ever before" is also not clear. I think "as for March 2009" or "According to a 2009 research" would be fine if you can add. And everyone could not know the intro is already referenced by existing sources. The tags are only for clarification, so I hope you're a bit more familiar with these. I love reading the article by the way, so keep up the good work. --Caspian blue 04:58, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Snark, sharks, and wild dogs. An interesting pattern... ChildofMidnight (talk) 23:24, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
You got mentioned in the RfA I just created ;-) ---Balloonman NO! I'm Spartacus! 02:16, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
It is very difficult for me to walk away from something...but I am getting better. Sometimes it is just not worth the headache. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 04:26, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
As you're not taking your accusations to WP:WQA or another forum, I'll assume they were made in haste and you didn't mean any of it. --Ronz (talk) 23:02, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
The edits by Law were entirely useless and simply copied the work I had done in my own user space. Do not revert please. Peter Damian (talk) 14:56, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi I'm Jonathansuh, long time ago I edited some bridges on the Han river articles. I just made another article, Ilsan Bridge. I hope you can help me expand it and put more stuff on it. Sorry. I'm only a 5th grader. Jonathansuh (talk) 19:43, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
Can you find a reference for this entry on the Tonkatsu article? Any help is appreciated. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 07:29, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
I'll send you an e-mail. –Juliancolton | Talk 23:32, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi, Caspian. I see there's a little Napoleon taking over a certain neighborhood in Seoul. ("Today Insadong, tomorrow Chamshil!") Drop me a line if he actually does put it up for deletion. I always enjoy seeing a self-important jack-ass make an even bigger fool of himself, and I can use the laugh. :) Dekkappai (talk) 02:40, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi Caspian blue. I do realize that I can be overly "social", (and I'll work on a better balance), but I did want to say how much I admire your recent work. You have my utmost respect for the work you do here - and I wanted you to know that. — Ched : ? 03:38, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
I didn't realize you were the one who reported the vandalism on the articles I edited. Thank you very much even if you don't agree with my contributions to Wikipedia.Jayzames (talk) 09:12, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
I think i might have seen it in your contrib history somewhere. Again, thanks.
Oh, and I am no longer a "dirty man from Samsung." :-) Jayzames (talk) 23:45, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Not quite, but I've lived here a very long time and am fluent in Korean.
I've been doing some edits on the Roh Moo-hyun, KCTU, and US beef imports in South Korea articles, which have raised the ire of the local activist community.
Jayzames (talk) 05:11, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Nope, I'm American, and have voted Democrat (NOT the Korean party) ever since I turned 18. I don't really like any party or any politician in Korea enough to endorse one. I did indeed work for Samsung at one time (and liked it when I was there), but do not now work for them or any other jaebeol.
It is typical for Korea's left-wing Internet activists to resort to conspiracy theories and dismiss any dissenters as someone who works for the GNP. I don't really take it seriously and I was more amused than offended by the remarks.
Jayzames (talk) 06:19, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Perhaps I got really agitated by your allegation and I didn't set the right tone when I replied you a moment ago but let me just ask you a question here... did you actually read and checked through the whole thing before you jump to conclusion and accuse me of templating that Sock tag on AO's user page (which is an accusation in its own right)? Edit history doesn't lie, you can check it to verify my claim that an ADMIN (specifically speaking it was User:Stifle) was the one responsible for placing that tag in the very first place, and not me as what you had thought. BTW, I've chosen to disengage from this episode after consulting with another uninvolved admin, so I'd really appreciate if you would review it properly instead of going there to rekindle that spark. --Dave1185 (talk) 21:59, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
While I appreciate that you're frustrated with Ronz, please do not engage Ronz in back and forth debate on my talk page (18 different posts between the two of you, over the course of almost two hours!). When I asked him to calm down and stop, I did not expect him to come to my talk page, nor did I expect you to follow him there and engage him in a battle of words there. I recommend just ignoring him if he continues arguing over every little thing, or perhaps start an RFC on whatever issue is causing the problem if you just can't come to an agreement or any sort of consensus. Please do not engage in further word battles with him on my talk page. If you need any assistance in dealing with his overzealousness on a particular issue, please let me know and I'll see what I can do. I appreciate your help. Thanks! ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 04:54, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
That said, the two links are perfectly acceptable as links, and should not be considered as spam. There is nothing even remotely spammy about them. Hope that helps! ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 04:56, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Except his first message, all conversations with Dave1185 (talk · contribs) are left on Dave1185's talk page[24]. This is just for the purpose to archive the case. So please do not restore the delete messages.--Caspian blue 15:41, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
rencontre
