|
| “ | Meatpuppet? Bouncehoper: What the crap is a meatpuppet? Baegis: A marionette that subsists on a diet solely of meat and its derivatives. Bouncehoper: ...How is that different than a sockpuppet? (also, makes me hungry....) Baegis: Sockpuppets, of course, eat cotton products, which are severely lacking in nutrition and deliciousness. Bouncehoper: How....strange....lol. thanks! from Baegis's talk page |
” |
| The 25 DYK Medal | ||
| For your continuous WP:DYK contributions on various topics related to Korea, such as clothing, food, events, places, biographies, etc., I, RyanCross (talk · contribs), hereby award Caspian blue (talk · contribs) The 25 DYK Medal! Great work, and keep up your contributions to DYK! I bet you can get everything that is Korean on the Main Page, you just have to keep at it like you're doing now. Take care, and enjoy this medal from me. :-) – RyanCross (talk) 01:32, 6 October 2008 (UTC) |
Congrats Caspian. Perhaps you could expand Heo Nanseolheon I just started and make it no.26? The Bald One White cat 15:29, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
Came across it on my travels, I also have proposed a {{Korea-writer-stub}} as amazingly it didn't exist yet, (I mean how many notable writers could we write about on wikipedia through the entirety of history the mind boggles). Its a shame we can't clone you hundreds of times given the content missing or that needs developing for korea!. Worse even is the coverage of Vietnam and Burma we have on here. I was watching By Any Means (which I am writing week by week on here) last night and he went though Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia and Thailand which as you know is a part of the world that inspires me and it was just amazing. He rode in a rocket boat down the Mekong for some part which was probably one of the coolest modes of transport I;ve seen. Even the articles on the largest cities in Vietnam are barely beyond stubs. If only we could cover it all in detail like America and the UK and have rleiable and abundant sources to boot. I'm currently stubbing Japanese dams in the hope that they will be translated from Japanese wiki. Hope you are well friend The Bald One White cat 16:52, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
Exactly. 95% of the articles we have related to Vietnam above a start class are Vietnam War and likely to be written from an American point of view, however neutral it strives to be. Thats why I use wikipedia to explore places and culture which I don't know about or will never get to see. Sure writing articles about films and local places and that which you are familiar with can be fun, but my overall goal and purpose on wikipedia is to branch out in the "grey areas" of the world from a "western" viewpoint. Given the extreme bias and the ignorance of many to "foreign" places, this is practically anything from Tijuana down to Tierra del Fuego, from Cairo to Walvis Bay, from Ankara eastwards to Tokyo etc. IN places the coverage seems unbelievably developed but browse through most of the categories on locations in Latin America, Africa and Asia and very few of articles on even major towns and cities are of a good standard, let alone 95% of the rest of the country which is "ignored" as of now. The strength of wikipedia really is from the people who live or are aquainted with cultures or places in "other" parts of the world and are able to develop it from their world viewpoint. Given time, I anticipate that people learning English in the developing world who increasingly have access to to computers and the web will begin to appear on increasingly on here. The unfortunate thing is that most people who visit wikipedia use us rather than nurture us, so the bulk of the work is done by a few thousand people. If we could maximise our potential, we'd see things start to change very fast and wikipedia would start growing at a rate which would seem more in keeping with its global reach The Bald One White cat 17:34, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
Cirt (talk) 22:56, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
BorgQueen (talk) 16:02, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
Good work on 최진실. Her suicide was really shocking, wasn't it. --BorgQueen (talk) 17:05, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
| A Thank You Card! | |
|---|---|
| Dear Caspian blue, thank you so much for your contribution to my request for Adminship I can tell you is this: I shall try not to disappoint you nor anyone else with my use of the buttons... and if I mess up, please tell me! :) If you ever need my help, either for admin-related stuff or in any other way, you are welcome to ask, and I shall do my very best.
Please take care. G.A.S 17:16, 7 October 2008 (UTC) |
|
A complicated subject to be sure. This is what I can dig up without too much trouble:
jianlian (金蓮) is a euphemism for bound-feet the shoes for those feet are call 金蓮履 I'll do something with the hats when there is time. Sjschen (talk) 18:42, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
Caspian blue, I'd like to thank you for voting in my RFA. Thanks also for expressing your trust in me, and I hope that I live up to your expectations. Don't forget, if you have any questions (or bits of advice), please leave a message on my talk page. Thanks again, SpencerT♦C 02:44, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
I don't really care about our issues on the article in question, I honestly believe that while we might each have different perspectives on the incident, that neither of us are trying to deceive anyone, we just want to emphasize different aspects of the article in different ways.
However, this new edit seems to be very different from anything I have read in the past - is it anywhere near the truth?
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Empress_Myeongseong&diff=prev&oldid=243863203
Sennen goroshi (talk) 13:26, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
BorgQueen (talk) 01:59, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi! You might be interested in the discussion at Chinese New Year. Thank you. VeryGoodBoy (talk) 03:02, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
Thank you very much for the barnstar - it's nice to be appreciated. I'll keep slugging away at that article. Waygugin (talk) 14:04, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
is operating two accounts called sockpuppeting? Btzkillerv (talk) 20:07, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
I have occasionally voted oppose, but I try not to vote too often (where I don't nominate) unless there's a point of order to bring up, e.g. where I feel policy is being misapplied, or in order to speed on things that seem fairly obviously to meet criteria, but which haven't made the quorum after 14 days. As a check, User:MZMcBride - wh I suppose would count as the deputy FSC director if we had proper titles - has agreed to make all judgements on whether things that I have been involved with get promoted or not.
More to the point - I think it's useful to keep standards a bit lower for the moment in order that we can achieve the critical mass that allows us to attract people who are able to raise standards higher. I've looked into the history of other featured content procedures, and it seems that standards will self-correct in time, but all successful Featured content projects had much lower standards at the start than they do now, and I suspect that holding featured sounds to similar levels before we get the talented people we need will only serve to keep featured sounds as a minority featured content process. Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 14:06, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
...for the support in my recent RfA which just passed. Kindest, Lazulilasher (talk) 23:17, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
My argument overall for images taken from the Princeton Communications Office (see also) is that on the office's site, under a section saying "Policies and restrictions", the only restriction relevant to these images is "Credit must be provided to..." I don't presume that there are double secret restrictions that aren't listed there. In contrast, it does include additional restrictions for certain classes of images: certain buildings and the University symbols. It also indicates a separate section of photos (not the one the Krugman photo et al come from) stated to be "for news media". It also goes on to say that there are other images available (i.e. not online) that do have additional/other restrictions on purpose of use and that do cost money.
I've emailed the PCO a couple of times for the brain-dead sure-fire absoposidefinite answer that a few people have been desirous of, and they have not given me one. - Keith D. Tyler ¶ 19:15, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Do not accuse editors of vandalism simply because you disagree with their edits. This was a totally unacceptable use of a warning template. Please attempt to resolve your differences with other editors in a more constructive manner in future. WJBscribe (talk) 23:08, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Who vandalised this talk page shamelessly.
--Caspian blue (talk) 12:08, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for the message you left on my talk page. I would personally love to support the Quaternionenadler to become a FP. I first made the vector image as a 'key' to refer to the picture and the original, and I would hope eventually I could make an imagemap so if you clicked on the shield it would take you to the article for the state. As for the article, I would love to move it into the mainspace; however at the moment it is very Work In Progress, as all the shields need to be identified. If you could help, it would be much appreciated, however if not I would see if I could put a link on the nomination page, and then transfer it in a few days. Some more history of the eagle may be best, as currently the page seems only to glorify my image, but I shall begin researching that soon, I am a bit bogged down at the moment!--23230 talk 16:24, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
and others
If you continue with your badgering, I will take this to ANI and ask that they block you. You've been advised by at least three 'crats, 3 admins, and 2 other editors that your behavior is verging on disruption and harassment. Please drop it, or I will take this to ANI.---Balloonman PoppaBalloon 20:24, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[2]
|
Hello Caspian blue, could you please explain your revert here more clearly and deeply? Thank you. --Valentim (talk) 22:15, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
{{unblock|I don't exceed 3RR and rather have used discussion pages for my edits. I opened up discussion by myself twice. I only reverted twice for the article in question in 24 hours. However, Nihonjoe falsely accused me for violating 3RR but also blocked me for his mistake. When my edit was reverted, I used relevant talk pages and talked to the users in dispute, but why should I be blocked by the admin? Kusunose (talk · contribs) reverted 3 times in a row, but admin Nihonjoe who has charged for WP:WikiProject Japan and has some multiple issues with me in the past, only blocked for the false charge. My last revert was 6 hours ago, when my last edit (second revert in this 24 hours) was contested, I did not even try to revert the edit by Oda Mari (talk · contribs). I rather waited for her response for her revert. I think Nihonjoe has sought to block me at this time for his issue, so I request for unblock. I don't believe the admin is impartial for Japan-Korea disputes as well as toward me. The admin has falsely accused me of being a somebody's sock without any evidences, so I have protested him for it and everything of our dispute stems from his initial refusal to apologize his accusation made in public and continued insults against me. I have tried to have good faith toward him but he now blocked for the false charge. Please see the diffs and relevant pages provided below. Thank you.--Caspian blue 05:58, 17 October 2008 (UTC)}}
So where is a 3RR violation? The 3rd edit was not even a revert since there is no similar edit for it. Moreover, Nihonjoe falsely accuses my last edit occurred past in 1 day and one hour for my first edit as gaming the system. I don't edit Wikipedia 24 hours a day and examine the time. If the blocking admin wants to block me for edit warring and blatant disregard for consensus, there should be evidences provided by him. Kusunose (talk · contribs) is not blocked by Nihonjoe, so the rationale is not fit to the situation.--Caspian blue 06:43, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
|
|
Hi Caspian. I don't have any experience with featured pictures but what do you think of this image? Its probably against criteria or a lousy photograph in the mind of photograph specialists but I thought it was an excellent image. Any thoughts?Blofeld of SPECTRE (talk) 20:57, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your note, thats what I thought. It is scenery wise a superb picture but I didn't think it was sharp enough for FA. Just imagine how it would look if taken by a professional photographer with a high quality camera! Blofeld of SPECTRE (talk) 10:50, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
Thank you. That's a good edit, and helpful. Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 00:51, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
Hey CB. If you notice any other Korean editors with a poor knowledge of image copyright policies uploading a rash of likely copyright violations, please give me a heads-up. Thanks, Deiz talk 10:07, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
According to Michael Friedrich (talk · contribs)'s own introduction, he is a young Japanese-Australian.[16] But he wrote somewhere he has lived in Japan more than 20 years. After pointed out on this along with his "intermediate" level of English, he said he just lived 5 years in Australia, but his heart is still there.(lol) He excused that his sockpuppet, Robert Houdini (talk · contribs) is his younger brother whose behaviors and agendas are identical to MF. After his graduation from University of Tokyo, the most prestigious university in Japan, he said the alleged brother went to U.S to study, but the last time stamp on August 31 does not make any sense. Robert Houdini claims he is a half Korean living in Japan. But Michael excused that he has Korean grandfather, so is automatically a descendant of Zainichi Korean based on Nagoya. But he had uploaded many bashing copyrighted images of 2002 Worldcup against Korea as well as his very negative edits on the subject. He said that's why he can read Korean language due to his home environment, and learned it to know more about Korean culture. However, he alleged that kimchi, Korean soul food was introduced to the West by Japanese first just like ramen.(lol) To sum up, he is a Korean-Japanese-Australian with poor Korean and English ability as well as with having a strong anti-Korean sentiment. Nevertheless, two checkusers confirmed the mentioned two are the same sock. Extremely rude D10 Spada (talk · contribs) (of course, sock of Michael) shouted that "I'm no interest in you", but his edit contracts his claim.(lol) It is so sad to see that possibly a elite young man of Japan blatantly disregard rules here and becomes a troll.-Caspian blue 11:17, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
I strongly encourage all editors on Japan-Korea articles to discuss issues calmly on talk pages not edit war. — Rlevse • Talk • 22:41, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
I don't like worthless edition war. Administrators recommend us going to Wikipedia:Mediation. Many Administrators are watching us. We have to resolve this problem and recover the order. Let's go to Wikipedia:Mediation about Woo Jang-choon. I call for Sennen goroshi, too.--Bukubku (talk) 00:35, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
Greetings...are you even reading the discussion on the talk page before making changes? The lawsuit is not being debated, but the huge amounts of false and dubious statements. As well as the fabricated statements. It would probably be more helpful for you to make your comments on the talk page than “drive-by” reverts. Jim (talk) 00:09, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Thank you so much for your kind comments about my Naksansa submission. I did spent quite a bit of time and effort on it, hoping to do well, given my experience. The fact that someone with your depth of knowledge, experience and accomplishments here takes the time to send me these favorable comments is greatly appreciated. I am also pleased to find that you feel this effort worthy of some recognition, although I am not familiar with this feature. I did read the WP:DYK entry (is this the "guide line" to which you refer?) but felt somewhat overwhelmed by all the rules and regulations therein. May I assume since you have nominated the Naksansa article that it meets these requirements? I understand that "Wikipedia:CITE#Inline_reference" needs to be embedded within the article but do not know where; beginning, end, or any place specefic. You will need to advise me please. With sincere appreciation Steve46814 (talk) 05:48, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Hello, Caspian blue. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding "anti-Japanese racial attacking". The discussion is about the topic Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User: Caspian blue. Thank you. --Kralizec! (talk) 23:49, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Actually, I vaguely recall looking at an Otello recording the other day. Let me see if I can find it again.
Is there any rush on it? Just that I prefer to do them over two days. Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 02:38, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Possibilities include:
Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 04:26, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
And now I'm having second thoughts. Is that an improvement on:
or am I just adding more flaws? This one doesn't edit very well. Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 04:46, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
--Seoul 04:19, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
BorgQueen (talk) 15:05, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Hello! I’m from Mainland China. And I want to talk about the article “North Korea” with you.
If the relational things in my memory are not error, the Wikipedia has a rule, such as if a word is translated from X language, it should be written with its original word in X language, such as the word “China” in English Wikipedia should be written with “中國”, because “China” is translated from “中國” in Chinese Language.
As everyone knows, the English word “North Korea” is translated from the Korean word “북한”. So it should be written with its Korean original word based on the relational rule in Wikipedia.
You could leave words in there if you want to write back.
I've blocked all three of you for edit-warring on Comfort women. I know you've had a lot of trouble with stalkers and abusive socks on that article, but in this case you do seem to be also quite stubbornly edit-warring, I hope you'll find ways of dealing with the dispute differently. Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:14, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2008-11-06 Woo Jang-choon Here's hoping it helps your dispute. Best wishes, DurovaCharge! 01:04, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Hello! I have reviewed your submission of Magoja at the Did You Know nominations page. I noticed some issues that need to be clarified, and have left comments for you underneath your nomination's entry. Please respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! —Politizer talk/contribs 16:06, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
might be nice if we both contributed here, it is certainly better resolved on a talk page, than with another 48 hour block
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Comfort_women#Proposed_changes
Sennen goroshi (talk) 16:25, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
I'm currently writing an article for Dream Cinema, a movie theatre in Seoul. My sources say that it was due to be torn down this year, but I can't find anything (in English) that says if this actually happened or not. As I am unable to read Korean, is there any chance you could take a quick look for any Korean-language sources? Thanks in advance. PC78 (talk) 18:29, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
Victuallers (talk) 20:36, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
Hello, Caspian blue. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at ANI regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Tan | 39 05:23, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi. A MedCab case has been opened here, regarding Woo Jang-choon. You have been named as a participant. Please visit the case page and indicate whether or not you will participate. Thank you. [roux » x] 23:03, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
Thanks Caspian-- I suppose I'm just recognizing my actual "semi-" status, since I'm still poking around here now & then. I've just added a little on Song Il-gon's latest, and noticed that we don't seem to have an article on the actor Moon Seong-geun... I noticed that the film article, Virgin Stripped Bare by Her Bachelors, spells his name as Mun Seong-kun, Green Fish spells it Moon Sung-keun... so maybe we have an article started on him somewhere, but under a different spelling? Not sure which one to use... Anyway, this news article might help with such an article-- it says he was Vice-chairman of the Korean Film Council in 1999. Dekkappai (talk) 20:15, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Quick question: with regard to Disturbance in Her Barroom, I am wondering if gibang is the same as gyobang? PC78 (talk) 02:00, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
Many thanks, the barnstar is much appreciated! :) PC78 (talk) 18:13, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your input at my successful Rfa. I'm already thinking about working on my content creation. Hopefully in a few months, I'll have passed the point where you would've !voted Support. If you have any more equally well-thought-out suggestions on how I can improve myself as an editor, I'd be happy to hear them. I wanted to ask you what you normally look for when you are evaluating an Rfa candidate's prior Afd contributions. I can see why you would look askance at the Arthur M. Dula nom (I wouldn't do one like that again), but I'm curious as to why you think my nom of Unspeakable Vault (of Doom) was so improper. Thanks again for your input!--Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 20:45, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for you kind invitation to join your group - I am afraid I won't be much use though - and I only occasionally look in and don't know many Korean things. I do think this has a nice potential for a good article. The picture and little and the extra additions you made make the article look much better. Many thanks (Msrasnw (talk) 23:13, 17 November 2008 (UTC))
I think there is quite a lot more in Ms Chapman's article we could use - and there could be quite a lot of nice links coming out of it I think. The picture is very nice but I think a better one showing the whole of the image might be nice. Best wishes (Msrasnw (talk) 23:19, 17 November 2008 (UTC))